From Equals with Love its a Question of Faith by Michelle Thomasson

Max Planck the German Physicist said “We have no right to assume that any physical laws exist, or if they have existed up to now that they will continue to exist in a similar manner in the future” (The Universe in the Light of Modern Physics).

Sir Isaac Newton told us why an apple falls down from the sky,
from this fact it´s not plain to see his thoughts oft pulsed with mercury.
By Jupiter that can´t be true! Well Jupiter helped him think things through.
The occult corpusculars he described set physics in motion on mechanical tides
and gravity’s force in his minds eye even created an end of time,
but relatively speaking what if time flies?
And energy equals mass multiplied by the speed of light squared,
An Einstein curve ball – spacetime.
 
Just a matter of fact? Well, hold onto your hat,
E=mc² lets take a good look at that.
= means equals… thinking things through
take two expressions (none inspired)
just place them gently side by side
voilà, they are exactly the same value
we may even conjecture me could = you.
 
However, equals in maths does not describe
how one is the other except by ink and two lines.
How does the E in energy really become the mass we see?
It could be kinetics that theory might do
as the speed molecules move makes mass come true
then look closer still – quarks will wave at you,
or in quanta packets, perhaps 3 for 2.
But then again in scales so small general relativity won´t sit nicely at all!
 
Still got your hat?
The how in energy to mass is not yet matter of fact.
Some even say, sub-atomically, we´ll only find what we presume to be,
though with a dash of quantum uncertainty.
Just like calculus or revised deep analysis
zero divided by zero won´t divide, so please mind the gap,
zero divided by zero leaves divide
there it is again, just a derivative of the mind.
 
This quest to understand has long gotten out of hand,
experiment without censure is like a pilot with dementia!
But knowledge is power for the merchants of light,
while power for powers sake burns your soul into night.
 
Some science tried to ennoble, saying it could prove God was true,
is that what He needed, or asked us to do?
Our earth is being torn, merged with risk and doubt
and our lives are shorn on investments that hide the way out.
We´ve a paradigm to shift, from the head – to the heart,
it´s a question of faith, that´s a good start.
Please lend an ear, try to listen,
then apples may fly because they´ve been left un-bitten.
 
By Michelle Thomasson
 

(Matthew 13:9 and 22:36-40)

.

Sir Isaac Newton after some revisions calculated the end time to be 1948 from “Newton´s Notebook, The Life, Times and Discoveries of Sir Isaac Newton” written and complied by Joel Levy.

“Newton and other seventeenth-century aficionados based their research on a hermetic tradition that went back to the Babylonians, was developed in Egypt and Greece as well as China and India, and arrived in Europe from the Islamic Empire in the twelfth century. As an eastern import, alchemy´s specialized vocabulary stemmed from transliterated Arabic words… One of Alchemy´s most open academic advocates was Roger Bacon, who is often heralded as a pioneer of modern experimental science. In a way he was-yet his emphasis on hands on-investigation came from alchemy, which he regarded as supremely valuable..” Science a Four Thousand Year History written by Patricia Fara (p. 100 -101 and 104, 2009).

Roger Bacon (c. 1214-92), ´Doctor mirabilis´, Franciscan philosopher… not later than 1236 he made his way to Paris where he was one of the first to lecture on Aristotle (incl. the ´Liber de Causis´). Here he became interested in experimentation and, c. 1247, resigned his chair to devote himself to science… A new stage in Bacon´s career was reached in the middle sixties… The outcome was the work since known as the ´Opus Majus´. This he soon followed by the ´Opus Minus´; and both Opera, together with ´De Multiplicatione Speciarum´ and a work on alchemy, were dispatched to the Pope  c. 1268. Unfortunately Bacon did not gain the Papal commendation he hoped for, Clement having died on 29 Nov 1268. Bacon then returned to Oxford, where he wrote inter alia, Gk. and Heb. grammars. He also completed his ´Opus Tertium´. The three ´Opera´ together were an encyclopaedic treatise, dealing with such diverse subjects as the relation between philosophy and theology, grammar, mathematics, geography, perspective, physiology, and experimental science (´domina omnium scientiarum´). The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church Edited by F.L. Cross, 1957.

Three and a half centuries later another Bacon – Francis Bacon became the main European proponent and champion of experimentation, he coined the phrase “knowledge is power” (Nam et ipsa scientia potestas est – For also knowledge itself is power Meditationes Sacrae 1597) and used the term “merchants of light” for experimental scientists – this is also noted in many books e.g. The Book of Books by Melvyn Bragg (2011).

“Bacon, Francis, (1561 – 1626), Viscount St. Albans, philosopher, essayist, orator, and lawyer… Throughout his life Bacon was strongly attracted to the problems of philosophy. His Proficience and Advancement of Learning (1605) was designed to sum up the stock and deficiencies of human knowledge and to insist that since man´s power to control nature was in his own hands, success rested on applying the right methods. By inductions from the simplest facts of experience man could reach forward to the discovery of fundamental principles which in turn would issue in beneficial practical results. In the Novum Organum (1620) he expounded these ideas more systematically. Here he outlined what he termed the ´Great Instauration´ and developed his well-known analysis of the fallacies which beset human thought (idola tribus, idola specus, idola fori, idola theatri)… His New Atlantis (1627, posthumous) described the ideal State, in which the New Philosophy would be carried through by political machinery and State guidance, aided by a college of science (´Solomon´s House´). Meanwhile Bacon´s Essays had been appearing with additions in each new edition (1597, 1612, 1625); the famous one on ´Atheism´ first saw light in 1612.

Bacon carried his empiricism into the realm of morals. He denied the existence of absolute rules of conduct or of a ´summum bonum´.” The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church Edited by F.L. Cross, 1957.  Please note: summum bonum – chief or supreme good.

Alchemy – al the + kimia, apparently a Gr. χημεία, found (c. 300) in the Decree of Diocletian against ´the old writings of the Egyptians, which treat of the χημία (transmutation) of gold and silver´: hence the word is explained by most as ´Egyptian art,´ and identified with χημία, Gr. form (in Plutarch) of the native name of Egypt (land of Khem or Khame, hieroglyphic Khmi, ´black earth´, in contrast to the desert sand). The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary, Volume 1971.

In 1557 Robert Recorde an English mathematician introduced the = sign for equals (The Whetstone of Witte).

 
 

Noetic radicals - mi Miro when the surreal is a function over the real and destroys it by Michelle Thomasson

 
Noetic radicals – when the mathematical surreal and the mercurial roots of our modern science are a function over the real, our very existence, flooding into all our thinking, harming our beautiful world and each other…
 
Closing down, reduced,
it has been deduced
everyone could be touched, perhaps even seduced,
by stealing away our liquidity
and devising the news with calamity.
 
The world’s a lottery, millions are desperate and hungry,
while we play with numbers,
profit forecast,
electronic dice, banking it fast.
 
Coding our culture for trends in the wealth,
snorting it up more money than sense
making us deaf, dumb and…
sad for the soul, bad for the health.
 
And the weight of debt, it’s a marionette!
An economic sleight of hand that weaves destruction through the land,
talking heads speak “cuts galore” - a culling on the workshop floor,
less makes less and more takes more,
at interest,
our gargoyles are grotesque.
 
Charmed
on esoteric nummary,
adhered, revered,
gaming the mind, we’ve experts in chaos
are we not blind?
Babylonian pursuits play on beautiful minds
faith only in numbers – a sign of the times
and wonders.
 
Now that’s a risk factor
with potential to cause harm
multiplied,
by all possibility
it will surely come to be,
the result of our imaginings,
noetic radicals try to pull the strings.
 
But - how far can we go
from the simplest of things?
Our hearts turned from one another
deception’s spiritual wings and poisoned alchemy.
~
by Michelle Thomasson
~
Noetic Radicals – noeticae radices – radicals of the intellect or imaginary roots. Imaginary numbers “no existence as quantity… they are permitted, by definition, to have an existence of another kind, into which no particular inquiry was made.” Augustus De Morgan, Trignometry & Double Algebra, 1849, London
 
Nummary: pertaining or relating to money or coinage, occupied with or dealing with money.
 
To hear Noetic radicals: http://audioboo.fm/boos/700373-noetic-radicals-by-michelle-thomasson
 
“Millions are desperate” – it should really be Billions, due to malnutrition, hunger and lack of clean water:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-17034134
http://www.worldhunger.org/articles/Learn/world%20hunger%20facts%202002.htm
http://www.fao.org/hunger/en/
 
Chalkhill Blue - Lysandra cordion on Jacob´s Knoll Minchinhampton Common

Chalkhill Blue - Lysandra cordion on Jacob´s Knoll near Minchinhampton Common July 2010 photo taken by Michelle

Reality is mediated by those who have power
or so we are led to believe
Crisis – the news – updates by the hour
feeding us constant anxiety
.
We hear only broken beauty
.
While the cleverest of minds intellectually joust
Just a theatre of prose, taught, don’t bring down the house
Politics of words shape shifting the view
Of our everyday lives, we can’t handle the truth?
.
We’re shown only broken beauty
.
Ministry of defence is the ministry of war
International development – exploiting the poor
Liberation to strive – a better world for all
Or the struggle to compete in a gladiators hall
.
Seeing only broken beauty…
.
Switch off; game online, now you’ve got control?
While most in the real world have no agency at all
The corridors of power lead in paths to deception
Will the ugliness to deceive prove king of it all?
.
Logic – that cannot come true
Even natures fundamental laws
Are beautiful too
.
Broken hearts, broken lives, broken beauty
Lost in our world of deception
The mighty chaos without a direction?
.
But the simplest of answers is true
Pure love never lies bleeding
Its path will always shine through
.
When honesty reigns in our hearts
A kingdom of lies falls away from our eyes
And no matter how unlettered
Wisdom you’ll gain – loves reality shines
.
I don’t believe in broken beauty
Michelle Thomasson
Even Kandinsky got climate change by Michelle Thomasson

Future view from investment bankers & credit rating agency´s window "oh there´s nothing left to bet on except the colour of the climate storm" ............ Oil on canvas painted by Michelle 2005

 

EU warns credit rating agencies (May 2010):

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10097107

The credit rating agencies are leading an assault on nations and peoples:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/dec/16/credit-rating-agencies-downgrade-spain

Bringing mutualism back into business and a reminder that our economic woes are the results of 1-way bets by a few thousand millionaires living in London; the excesses and failures of investment banks, opinion by William Davies:

http://www.policy-network.net/articles/3933/Bringing-mutualism-back-into-business

Watching our forests still burn - Michelle Thomasson

REDD+ (Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation) is the latest international plan to use financial incentives and market mechanisms to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and degradation. After recent climate debate in Cancun (29 Nov – 10 Dec 2010) the draft decision outcome, text C, part 80 (1) states that in next year’s climate talks they will consider the establishment of market-based mechanisms for REDD+

How can the use of the market promote long term unwavering investment when markets are primarily driven by fear and greed in the continual search for short term gains?

If forests are protected, what will happen to market prices when forest stocks are stable or they increase – wouldn´t that attract less market return?

Who would be the beneficiaries of the trade in trees and their carbon storage, would the shareholders expect a maximisation of profit? Would indigenous people be stakeholders, shareholders or evicted? REDD+ has been shown to work without a carbon market (2)

Lacking the Black Eyed Peas, I´m rapping this one, imagine your favourite regional accent:

Yo Bro!
Can’t take it as REDD
that we’re all into dealing
Carbon price on our heads.
.
Won’t keep us cool
ain´t nobody’s fool
Blue sky casino
or a trader’s tool.
.
Zip it up Man!
You got it all wrong
City talk goin nowhere
you’re doin self-harm.
You think it’s a breeze,
paying for the trees,
but prices going a change
when the markets sneeze.
.
Ain´t very smart
not according to need,
just money beat
driving fear and greed.
.
Yo Bro!
You got an attitude
Think you should have everything
Just pay another dude
To be a lot less
and you take a lot more
CO2 ain´t for sharing
think the forests going to store
all that hot air
we’re makin more and more.
.
Yo Bro!
Don’t you want to know?
Anaesthetised from reality
with virtual insanity
Capitalising our humanity
Working a totality
to keep the profits up
abundant not allowed,
planning on Earth Ltd?
No free soul would be found.
.
Yo Bro!
Can’t take it as REDD
That those with a conscience
Are good but dead
Cos we’re still around
we´re getting clear and loud
We got to cut emissions
That´s the honest rap´s sound.
.
Or it´s Yo Bro – what a way to go!
Honest beats a drummin
You ain´t gonna steal the show.
Michelle Thomasson
.

Contraction and convergence of our CO2 emissions

Ref: (1) From the UNFCC the Draft decision -/CP.16 Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention (Dec 2010):

http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_16/application/pdf/cop16_lca.pdf

(2) “New data shows REDD+ is succeeding”  and without a carbon market, comment by Doug Boucher, director of the Tropical Forest and Climate Initiative at the Union of  Concerned Scientists:

http://news.mongabay.com/2010/1215-boucher-redd_is_succeeding.html

Background into the origins of carbon trading and the trade in world pollution – Carbon Trading, A Critical Conservation on Climate Change, Privatisation and Power, edited by Larry Lohman:

http://www.thecornerhouse.org.uk/resource/carbon-trading-0

How does the abstract drive us ever onward?
The learned amongst us say the left hemisphere’s to blame
While the right sits in silence, intuition has no game.
But the poetry of honesty has no mention as yet,
or how easily we learn to forget…
Uncomfortable truths
the unfettered market and City rules.
-
Skyline’s been pierced by virtual wealth
myths dealt and traded,
on 24/7 feral stealth.
On a foundation of negatives,
voraciously dreamt,
in the pursuit of pure profit
over a chasm of debt,
just a concept,
with derivatives
but it entraps most it’s met.
-
Less than nothing,
has a price,
finance is in control
the cuts hit people
the stock market bell takes its toll,
or is it collateral damage?
-
Real lives,
pawn brokered,
we can no longer afford.
Aid? Medicines, they won’t go abroad.
Services, facilities, even books and their worth
will be shelved for our cut-price,
discounted,
virtual world.
-
The skyline’s been pierced,
light could shine through,
if we help one another and one another helps too.
-
What makes us believe that’s so difficult to do?
-
Has our hope been imprisoned by imaginary wealth,
so your soul knows no empire
except all those dreams
that persuade us to benefit the few.
Michelle Thomasson

When economists distil their craft to the essentials they say: hope equals wealth (money)… does wealth equal hope?

Our psychological money chain is based on a concept of a promise to pay that has its current foundations based on another concept – debt – or money that has simply been conjured up into existence by electronically loaning it to us.

Since the financial debt bubble burst it has been compounded a billion fold and real cuts in spending are being made in an attempt to pay back money that did not exist in real terms (positive numbers in accounts), in the first place. Did you see the sleight of hand?

As money is a concept based on a promise to pay why can’t the money be electronically granted into existence? What would happen to the global money chain if there was no enslaving debt and how would this better protect the environment if there was no need for the economy to unsustainably grow – just to get back up to zero?

Is that too logical or ethical for those who control our current money system?

Please take a look at the Art of Illusion: http://littlepoiesis.org/art-of-illusion/

Till debt us do part – the title above echoes a TV comedy series “Till death us do part” about the UK´s cultural landscape in the mid 1960´s and the bigotry people suffered. Alf Garnett (played by Warren Mitchell) typified the bigotry by expressing loathing for many things, especially scroungers.

Today with serious cuts in jobs and public spending who would Alf shout at? The musical chairs have stopped and if you aren’t on a chair (in the right tier of the money chain), with profits bagged from the global financial ponzi scheme: cash in the bank, a roof safely over your head and / or a job, would you be the object of Alf´s self righteous fear as he screams scrounger at you too? Or out of fear are we all becoming ignorant like Alf, repeating the mantra about inevitable cuts? After all it´s not easy to see clearly when those who have the power to create our money and reclaim it are also directly or indirectly influencing our hope.

Ref: www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/tilldeathusdopart/

Online networks, social media and digital publishers need to show their relevancy to advertisers – they do that by selling their audience (their readers) to the advertising industry et al.

The publishers value is not based on content or brand but on the information that can be collected about each digital visitor, as you click away your preferences and online patterns are being delivered up to the advertising market because the ability to sell this information about you, is the true value a publisher now has. (Other researchers may also be interested in your internet behaviour.) Hence this comment in the New York Times today about the E.U´s intention to overhaul the online privacy rules to protect personal data, note the term “development of services” isn´t that a euphemism for snooping?:

“Rules requiring Internet companies to secure users’ consent upfront could hamper the development of services that align online advertising with Web users’ personal interests, as reflected in the Web sites they visit or the preferences they express in social networks and other online forums. From a marketer’s perspective, this could dilute one of the big advantages of the Web over traditional media.” Ref: www.nytimes.com/2010/11/05/technology/05privacy.html?_r=2

Also refer to a NewScientist article in July this year:

“EVERY move you make, every twitter feed you update, somebody is watching you. You may not think twice about it, but if you use a social networking site, a cellphone or the internet regularly, you are leaving behind a clear digital trail that describes your behaviour, travel patterns, likes and dislikes, divulges who your friends are and reveals your mood and your opinions. In short, it tells the world an awful lot about you.” Ref: www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727701.100-social-web-the-great-tipping-point-test.html?page=3

Has the penny dropped about some of the market behind digital only media? Perhaps we could all practice a little random but safe/legal online clicking to confuse the advertisers and researchers stats, doing our bit to help keep publishing content balanced and reasonable with less tailored facts.

In regards to climate change can technology fix the fix we are in when our current technological know-how is not independent of economic, political and social structures? If most of our innovations are regulated by profit and war rather than by need can geoengineering technology be applied by a neutral benevolent source independent of the current economic power structures?

Yesterday in Japan at the  UN´s 10th meeting for the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) a press release was given out by the ETC group (1) that a climate engineering moratorium had been agreed allowing time to assess the risks to the environment and biodiversity as well as the social, economic and cultural consequences. As of this post, this strong statement has received little news in the general media.

From ETC´s press conference about the moratorium (2)  shown via a webcast direct from the CBD, ETC pointed out that a moratorium was not ideal but that it was the result of the multilateral system´s lack of capacity to monitor climate engineering activities. The countries readily backing the ban were from developing regions such as South America and Africa while those countries promoting geoengineering initiatives were the UK and US. According to ETC this moratorium was passed by other governments because they were shocked by the climate engineering proposals and initiatives already being discussed by the US Congress and the UK Royal Society.

Yesterday, coincidentally, the US Science and Technology Committee released it´s report on climate engineering and the chairman stated “This report is in no way meant as an endorsement of climate engineering” (3) however, what it does endorse and reveal is how policy-makers are being asked to consider climate engineering research and the importance of scientific freedom (4). [Compare the Royal Society´s study on the governance of geoengineering (5)].

Scientific freedom, does it exist? In our market driven world the demand for the majority of things is influenced by the distribution of income and wealth´s power structures – it´s not according to need or as a benefit to all.

(1) http://www.etcgroup.org/en/node/5227

(1 also includes links to the relevant in session CBD documents all in session documents can be found here: http://www.cbd.int/cop10/insession/?tab=0)

(2) http://webcast.cop10.go.jp/player.asp?id=2902&type=ondemand

(3) http://science.house.gov/press/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=2945

(4) http://democrats.science.house.gov/Media/file/Reports/EngineeringTheClimate_StaffReport.pdf

(5) http://royalsociety.org/Royal-Society-launches-major-study-on-the-governance-of-geoengineering/

Staring into the past we can see the many gods different cultures have made, or rather created according to the desires of the powerful, deities fashioned to maintain social control, perhaps tweaked by the latest philosophical thoughts to make sure the intellectual elite could be comfortably included.

Lacking religious formulas to direct society we have found another, the mesmerising invisible hand of the free market, charting the course of humanity on the trade winds of the stock market floor. Surreal – play some Gregorian chant as background music and here we go…

Our free market which art in the cloud computer, hallowed be thy game.
Thy kingdom has come,
in London, New York, Paris and Tokyo to name but a few.
Give us this day our daily trades and let us forget our trespasses
as have the insider dealers.
And lead us not into a mutually cooperative society,
thereby delivering us from equality.
For thine is the gated community,
the power and glitzy glory, plus a bit of billionaire bling,
for as long as they can be fooled.
-
Now should we try rap…

Tweeps

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.